In order to achieve the rest of its vision, the country has adopted sustainable agricultural practices with almost universal support from farmers and politicians. When farmers in Sweden were striving for output rather than prioritizing resource management, artificial fertilizer use jumped several fold between and In order to address the excess use of synthetic fertilizers, the Swedish government implemented an environmental tax on certain fertilizers, including many nitrogen fertilizers, in Nitrogen fertilizers, in particular, are notorious for causing environmental problems, including the pollution of water, eutrophication of surface waters, and acidification of natural landscapes.
The use of nitrogen fertilizers declined by roughly 14 percent between and Since then, the percent of agriculture area dedicated to organic production has soared from 5. Given the initial progress, Sweden has reiterated its support for organic agriculture production by setting a new goal of 20 percent.
Due to the credits available under the CAP, grasslands and fodder can make up a sizable amount of certified organic production among countries in the EU. While Sweden is no exception, the country has had increasing success in also growing organic cereal, meat, fruit, and vegetable production. In fact, organic wheat production has nearly doubled between and Sweden has also funded agricultural and emergency programs in Somalia, Mali, Chad, Ethiopia, and Kenya.
Yet, the country could do far more for global food security, including pushing for greater access of African food imports within the EU.
In light of its limited role within global agriculture, it may be more proper to showcase Sweden as an alternative path rather than the yardstick by which all other countries are measured. The dedication to sustainable agricultural practices and organic food production, along with the willingness to incur higher food imports at a greater cost burden for its consumers, is laudable. Lower food consumption and the adoption of the virtual water concept in developed regions could be another application in ensuring long-term food security, but ones that would likely face considerable resistance.
Furthermore, agricultural producers would likely argue that, excess consumption leads to the generation of demand support. Without consumption, they would be unable to keep investment in research and development and, in turn, production on an upward trajectory.
Then when daily food consumption in developing economies caught up, supply would be inadequate. Longer growing seasons are producing increased harvests and providing the potential for new crops. At the same time, more pests and weeds are emerging, and new requirements for watering and drainage may arise due to the altered precipitation patterns 2.
Many factors influence the future use of Swedish agricultural land. The three factors that are expected to determine the productivity trend are technical development, increased carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere, and climate change.
In the longer term, the increase will be even greater. The need for agricultural land will therefore reduce, despite the increase in the population. Increased temperatures will lead to increased growth, particularly in the spring, when growth is currently severely restricted by temperature. In the number of days by which the start of the growing season is brought forward, for instance, may be up to in the south compared with the period — 2. For Sweden, the change of crop yield in referred to has been estimated based on several combinations of models and scenarios; the outcomes show an increase ranging from The growing zones will move northwards.
Assuming that no extra investment is required, the increases in harvests would mean increased earnings of SEK 65 billion up until for increased yield, and SEK billion in the event of optimised crop selection.
An increased occurrence of pests and weeds is expected to increase crop losses. Calculated on the basis of a linear increase over the century in the same way as for growth, this would total approximately SEK 40 billion through until the end of the century.
The cost estimates to not include change-over costs, increased costs for improved drainage or increased costs for input goods. Cloudbursts, flooding of watercourses and lakes, as well as storms, are other factors that will probably result in increased damage costs for agriculture.
The future extent of cloudbursts is difficult to estimate 2. The impact of climate change on two grass species timothy and ryegrass was assessed at several locations in Northern Europe Iceland, Scandinavia, Baltic countries in a near-future scenario — compared with the baseline period — Predicted yield response was largest at western locations.
The growing period was predicted to start earlier in compared with the baseline period. The yield response showed a west-east geoclimatic gradient, with the largest yield responses at locations with a maritime climate in the west and the smallest at inland locations in the east.
This gradient was especially evident under non-irrigated conditions due to the generally larger precipitation at the western locations In the short term, a rising concentration of CO2 can stimulate photosynthesis, leading to increases in biomass production in C3 crops such as wheat, barley, rye, potato and rice The response is much smaller in C4 crops such as maize.
These benefits will be particularly pronounced in northern Europe. As climate change advances, however, its negative impacts, such as more frequent winter floods, are likely to outweigh these benefits 15, How do climate impacts compare to socioeconomic pressures over this century?
Where and how do significant interactions arise? According to the authors, a fully coherent, unified data and modelling system has been used for the first time Model results indicated that agriculture in developed countries as a group would benefit under climate change. Model results indicated decreases in agricultural GDP in most developing regions, with the exception of Latin America According to these scenarios the developing countries will become more dependent on net cereal imports.
Increased production requires increased use of fertilisers. Problems with pests such as insects, fungi and viruses will increase in a warmer climate. The weed flora is expected to become more species-rich.
If the use of pesticides were to rise to Danish levels, this would mean almost twice present levels 2. Despite the fact that the conditions for agriculture in Sweden will generally improve, the risk of extensive crop damage as a consequence of extreme weather events, such as drought, intensive rain and flooding, will probably increase 2.
I am doing a project on sweden 4 school and id like as much info as possible please. Thank you for your helpful article and information. I needed it for a novel I am writing. I would like to know what farm products can be imported into Sweden, farm produce that are needed in Sweden, especially from west Africa. I would also like to know who to contact about laws and regulations concerning import of farm produce.
I would be very grateful if you can help me on this. Ben deschweinitz. Thank you for this helpful article i am also doing a project about Sweden 4 school and mah teacher is very particular when it comes to Sweden he was born there.
I'm doing a project on Sweden at school and this helped so much. Thanks a million! I am doing a country project for Sweden. So does anyone know, What is the primary agriculture type practiced in sweden. In terms of agricultural regions. Example,Pastoral nomadism, commercial agriculture, ranching, etc. I am doing a Swedish agriculture project for school and this helped me a lot! What about the agriculture in Sweden in BC?
What are the crops calibrated in Sweden?
0コメント